<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36980</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning undisclosed income from jewellery. The Court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a sum of Rs. 40,000 represented income from undisclosed sources. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s findings defective and unreasonable, noting that the assessee had provided a reasonable explanation for the possession of the jewellery. As a result, the Court concluded that the entire value of the jewellery should be accepted as explained, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues and ordering each party to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:44:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36980</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning undisclosed income from jewellery. The Court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a sum of Rs. 40,000 represented income from undisclosed sources. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s findings defective and unreasonable, noting that the assessee had provided a reasonable explanation for the possession of the jewellery. As a result, the Court concluded that the entire value of the jewellery should be accepted as explained, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues and ordering each party to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>