https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753511 HC reviewed a GST demand order challenging an assessment under Section 73 of CGST Act. The court found the original order cryptic and insufficiently reasoned, despite the petitioner providing detailed documentary evidence. HC set aside the order, remanded the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, and granted the petitioner 30 days to file a supplementary reply. The court explicitly reserved all substantive rights of both parties and directed a fresh, reasoned assessment. en-us Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2025 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753511 HC reviewed a GST demand order challenging an assessment under Section 73 of CGST Act. The court found the original order cryptic and insufficiently reasoned, despite the petitioner providing detailed documentary evidence. HC set aside the order, remanded the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, and granted the petitioner 30 days to file a supplementary reply. The court explicitly reserved all substantive rights of both parties and directed a fresh, reasoned assessment. Case-Laws GST Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753511