<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36978</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the assessee&#039;s wife and son did not become partners in the main firm but a sub-partnership was formed among the assessee, his wife, and son. The income of the wife and son from the sub-partnership should be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 64 of the Income Tax Act. The court granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court due to substantial questions of law involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36978</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the assessee&#039;s wife and son did not become partners in the main firm but a sub-partnership was formed among the assessee, his wife, and son. The income of the wife and son from the sub-partnership should be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 64 of the Income Tax Act. The court granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court due to substantial questions of law involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>