<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 103 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753496</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restricting the addition to 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases or the profit voluntarily declared by the assessee, whichever is higher. This decision adhered to the settled law that only the profit element of such purchases should be added, aligning with the Revenue&#039;s previous approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 103 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753496</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restricting the addition to 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases or the profit voluntarily declared by the assessee, whichever is higher. This decision adhered to the settled law that only the profit element of such purchases should be added, aligning with the Revenue&#039;s previous approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>