https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78105 The ITAT Delhi addressed two key issues. Firstly, on disallowance of provision for leave encashment, the AO rejected the claim as it was not made through a revised return. The Tribunal held that deduction can only be allowed when actual payment is made u/s 43B(f) of the Act, citing a Supreme Court ruling. AO directed to verify actual payment date. Secondly, on taxability of excise duty subsidy, the Tribunal ruled it as capital receipt based on earlier decisions, holding it non-taxable. Additional ground raised by the assessee was allowed. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:04:03 +0530 Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:04:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78105 The ITAT Delhi addressed two key issues. Firstly, on disallowance of provision for leave encashment, the AO rejected the claim as it was not made through a revised return. The Tribunal held that deduction can only be allowed when actual payment is made u/s 43B(f) of the Act, citing a Supreme Court ruling. AO directed to verify actual payment date. Secondly, on taxability of excise duty subsidy, the Tribunal ruled it as capital receipt based on earlier decisions, holding it non-taxable. Additional ground raised by the assessee was allowed. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:04:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78105