<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 92 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753485</link>
    <description>Bulk-imported Biofos Mono Calcium Phosphate was classified under heading 2835 as calcium monobasic phosphate, because the product was found to be a mixture predominantly consisting of mono calcium phosphate monohydrate. Applying Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 28 and the General Rules for Interpretation, the specific tariff sub-heading prevailed over the more general animal-feed heading 2309. The claim that fluorine was deliberately retained so as to bring the goods within animal-feed preparation was rejected as unsupported by the product composition and safety data sheet. The appeal was rejected, and the attempted misclassification was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 92 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753485</link>
      <description>Bulk-imported Biofos Mono Calcium Phosphate was classified under heading 2835 as calcium monobasic phosphate, because the product was found to be a mixture predominantly consisting of mono calcium phosphate monohydrate. Applying Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 28 and the General Rules for Interpretation, the specific tariff sub-heading prevailed over the more general animal-feed heading 2309. The claim that fluorine was deliberately retained so as to bring the goods within animal-feed preparation was rejected as unsupported by the product composition and safety data sheet. The appeal was rejected, and the attempted misclassification was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>