https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314358 A suit instituted against a company after a compulsory winding-up order was held not maintainable without prior leave under Section 171 of the Companies Act, because leave to continue or proceed was treated as available only where the proceeding had been instituted before the winding-up order. The Court also held that it could dispose of the matter at the interlocutory stage once it became clear that the suit could not be maintained against the company. The suit against the company was dismissed. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:30:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314358 A suit instituted against a company after a compulsory winding-up order was held not maintainable without prior leave under Section 171 of the Companies Act, because leave to continue or proceed was treated as available only where the proceeding had been instituted before the winding-up order. The Court also held that it could dispose of the matter at the interlocutory stage once it became clear that the suit could not be maintained against the company. The suit against the company was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Jun 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314358