<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1195 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314354</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for non-appearance was recalled under Rule 24 because the assessee stated that no notice of hearing had been received, constituting sufficient cause for absence. The prior dismissal was not on the merits of the dispute, so the procedural conditions for recall were satisfied. On that basis, the Tribunal restored the appeal and allowed the miscellaneous application in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1195 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314354</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for non-appearance was recalled under Rule 24 because the assessee stated that no notice of hearing had been received, constituting sufficient cause for absence. The prior dismissal was not on the merits of the dispute, so the procedural conditions for recall were satisfied. On that basis, the Tribunal restored the appeal and allowed the miscellaneous application in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>