<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 77 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36965</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the notices issued under sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was not justified as no income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that the Income Tax Officer had not considered the lease deed terms during the original assessment. Additionally, the court found that the audit report did not provide new information under section 147(b) but merely offered a legal interpretation, leading to the conclusion that the proposed reassessment would be futile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 77 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36965</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the notices issued under sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was not justified as no income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that the Income Tax Officer had not considered the lease deed terms during the original assessment. Additionally, the court found that the audit report did not provide new information under section 147(b) but merely offered a legal interpretation, leading to the conclusion that the proposed reassessment would be futile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>