<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT BANGLORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753436</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service tax demand on equity share transfer with non-compete and non-solicit clauses was invalid. The transfer qualified as an ongoing concern under Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax, providing full exemption. No separate consideration was received for non-compete conditions, which were standard contractual terms integral to business transfer. The agreement must be interpreted holistically per party intentions, not tax provisions. Non-compete clauses are normal in business transfers and cannot be artificially separated to deny exemption benefits. Service tax demand, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT BANGLORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753436</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service tax demand on equity share transfer with non-compete and non-solicit clauses was invalid. The transfer qualified as an ongoing concern under Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax, providing full exemption. No separate consideration was received for non-compete conditions, which were standard contractual terms integral to business transfer. The agreement must be interpreted holistically per party intentions, not tax provisions. Non-compete clauses are normal in business transfers and cannot be artificially separated to deny exemption benefits. Service tax demand, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>