https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314340 A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable against a Waqf Tribunal decision where the Waqf Act, 1995 provides a statutory revisional remedy under the proviso to Section 83(9). The Act makes the Tribunal's decision final and binding, bars an appeal, and empowers the High Court to examine correctness, legality, or propriety through revision. Where a specific statutory remedy exists, it must ordinarily be pursued, and writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass that remedy merely because a party is dissatisfied with the Tribunal's order. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:28:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314340 A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable against a Waqf Tribunal decision where the Waqf Act, 1995 provides a statutory revisional remedy under the proviso to Section 83(9). The Act makes the Tribunal's decision final and binding, bars an appeal, and empowers the High Court to examine correctness, legality, or propriety through revision. Where a specific statutory remedy exists, it must ordinarily be pursued, and writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass that remedy merely because a party is dissatisfied with the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314340