https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314343 A plaint based on administration of assets in aid of foreign bankruptcy proceedings was treated as a commercial dispute, and it was not rejected under Order VII Rule 11 because the absence of loan documents, locus objections, foreign-law objections and limitation under foreign law did not defeat the suit at the threshold. Section 44A was held inapplicable since no foreign decree was sought to be executed in India, while the foreign bankruptcy judgments could be recognised for the limited purpose of establishing bankruptcy and trustee authority absent any bar under Sections 13 and 14. Leave was also granted under Order XI Rule 1(5) to place translated additional documents on record, as they were relevant, the case was at an early stage, and no prejudice was shown. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:28:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314343 A plaint based on administration of assets in aid of foreign bankruptcy proceedings was treated as a commercial dispute, and it was not rejected under Order VII Rule 11 because the absence of loan documents, locus objections, foreign-law objections and limitation under foreign law did not defeat the suit at the threshold. Section 44A was held inapplicable since no foreign decree was sought to be executed in India, while the foreign bankruptcy judgments could be recognised for the limited purpose of establishing bankruptcy and trustee authority absent any bar under Sections 13 and 14. Leave was also granted under Order XI Rule 1(5) to place translated additional documents on record, as they were relevant, the case was at an early stage, and no prejudice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314343