<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Pre-Existing Dispute Bars Insolvency Petition; Arbitration Initiation Indicates Substantial Dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78033</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, addressed the admissibility of a section 9 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in the presence of pre-existing disputes between the parties. Referring to the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Mobilox Innovations Pvt Ltd Vs Kirusa Software Pvt Ltd, it was emphasized that a pre-existing dispute must be more than a feeble legal argument or unsupported assertion. The Tribunal noted that the existence of claims or counterclaims, even without a reply to a demand notice, could establish a pre-existing dispute warranting rejection of a Section 9 petition. In this case, the Corporate Debtor had already initiated arbitration proceedings prior to the Section 9 pet.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Pre-Existing Dispute Bars Insolvency Petition; Arbitration Initiation Indicates Substantial Dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78033</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, addressed the admissibility of a section 9 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in the presence of pre-existing disputes between the parties. Referring to the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Mobilox Innovations Pvt Ltd Vs Kirusa Software Pvt Ltd, it was emphasized that a pre-existing dispute must be more than a feeble legal argument or unsupported assertion. The Tribunal noted that the existence of claims or counterclaims, even without a reply to a demand notice, could establish a pre-existing dispute warranting rejection of a Section 9 petition. In this case, the Corporate Debtor had already initiated arbitration proceedings prior to the Section 9 pet.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>