<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1289 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314334</link>
    <description>The Enforcement Directorate agreed to accept a fixed deposit in the name of its Director for the equivalent value of the attached land, allowing the petitioner to substitute the attachment with that security. The writ petition was then disposed of on that basis, with a direction to furnish the fixed deposit within one week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1289 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314334</link>
      <description>The Enforcement Directorate agreed to accept a fixed deposit in the name of its Director for the equivalent value of the attached land, allowing the petitioner to substitute the attachment with that security. The writ petition was then disposed of on that basis, with a direction to furnish the fixed deposit within one week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>