<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 26 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753419</link>
    <description>The ITAT Surat confirmed addition of 6% on bogus purchases following the precedent in Pankaj K. Chaudhary case. The Tribunal applied consistent treatment across 14 appeals with similar facts, sustaining the 6% addition rate for estimation of income from bogus purchases. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the issue was squarely covered by established precedent with no change in material facts warranting different treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 26 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753419</link>
      <description>The ITAT Surat confirmed addition of 6% on bogus purchases following the precedent in Pankaj K. Chaudhary case. The Tribunal applied consistent treatment across 14 appeals with similar facts, sustaining the 6% addition rate for estimation of income from bogus purchases. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the issue was squarely covered by established precedent with no change in material facts warranting different treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>