<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 7 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753400</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to estimate assessee&#039;s income following binding precedents from earlier years. The Tribunal modified profit estimation from 12.5% to 11.5% on contract work. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed regarding section 80-IA(4) deduction disallowance, interest disallowance under section 14A, and business promotion expenses. The Tribunal confirmed that when income is estimated after rejecting books of accounts, additional disallowances under section 40A(3) cannot be made. CIT(A)&#039;s factual findings on cash payments at remote construction sites and business-related expenditures were upheld as justified business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 7 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753400</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to estimate assessee&#039;s income following binding precedents from earlier years. The Tribunal modified profit estimation from 12.5% to 11.5% on contract work. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed regarding section 80-IA(4) deduction disallowance, interest disallowance under section 14A, and business promotion expenses. The Tribunal confirmed that when income is estimated after rejecting books of accounts, additional disallowances under section 40A(3) cannot be made. CIT(A)&#039;s factual findings on cash payments at remote construction sites and business-related expenditures were upheld as justified business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>