https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78032 CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity and quality, overvalued goods, and failed to comply with Advance Authorization requirements. Allegations of concealment and suppression of facts were proven, as the appellant utilized a lapsed authorization for importing goods. Procedural irregularities in sample drawl and examination were noted, with discrepancies in fabric composition. The appellant failed to discharge export obligations and suffered financial losses due to non-cooperation. The appellant's attempt to export goods as a third party exporter was fraudulent. The order of confiscation and penalties imposed were upheld, as the appellant failed to refute findings and evidence presented by the department. Both appeals were dismissed. en-us Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:31:01 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:31:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78032 CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity and quality, overvalued goods, and failed to comply with Advance Authorization requirements. Allegations of concealment and suppression of facts were proven, as the appellant utilized a lapsed authorization for importing goods. Procedural irregularities in sample drawl and examination were noted, with discrepancies in fabric composition. The appellant failed to discharge export obligations and suffered financial losses due to non-cooperation. The appellant's attempt to export goods as a third party exporter was fraudulent. The order of confiscation and penalties imposed were upheld, as the appellant failed to refute findings and evidence presented by the department. Both appeals were dismissed. Highlights Customs Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:31:01 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78032