<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 4 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753397</link>
    <description>Customs authorities could not suspend or restrict CCSP approval under the Customs Act and the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 to enforce alleged breaches of the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989. The customs framework was confined to customs-area supervision and obligations arising under that framework, while hazardous-chemicals compliance belonged to an independent environmental regime enforced by designated authorities. Public notices and circulars could not expand statutory power. Alleged exceedance of hazardous-chemical thresholds and any need for regularization under that separate regime therefore could not justify the impugned customs action, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:30:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 4 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753397</link>
      <description>Customs authorities could not suspend or restrict CCSP approval under the Customs Act and the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 to enforce alleged breaches of the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989. The customs framework was confined to customs-area supervision and obligations arising under that framework, while hazardous-chemicals compliance belonged to an independent environmental regime enforced by designated authorities. Public notices and circulars could not expand statutory power. Alleged exceedance of hazardous-chemical thresholds and any need for regularization under that separate regime therefore could not justify the impugned customs action, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>