<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1601 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314329</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC ruled that the Enforcement Directorate cannot demand vacant possession or take coercive steps for possession of the properties until further orders are issued by the Court or the Appellate Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Petition was disposed of without costs, and parties may apply to the Appellate Authority once appointments are made. All contentions remain open for consideration by the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 21:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1601 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314329</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC ruled that the Enforcement Directorate cannot demand vacant possession or take coercive steps for possession of the properties until further orders are issued by the Court or the Appellate Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Petition was disposed of without costs, and parties may apply to the Appellate Authority once appointments are made. All contentions remain open for consideration by the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>