https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314331 The HC addressed a challenge to the attachment of properties valued at Rs. 72 crores. Petitioners contested the attachment due to the unavailability of the Appellate Authority and offered to deposit Rs. 3 crores in a fixed deposit with the ED. The court ordered the attachment to be substituted by the fixed deposit, preserving parties' rights before the Appellate Authority. The SLP and pending applications were disposed of, directing the Appellate Authority to proceed independently and lawfully. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 21:36:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314331 The HC addressed a challenge to the attachment of properties valued at Rs. 72 crores. Petitioners contested the attachment due to the unavailability of the Appellate Authority and offered to deposit Rs. 3 crores in a fixed deposit with the ED. The court ordered the attachment to be substituted by the fixed deposit, preserving parties' rights before the Appellate Authority. The SLP and pending applications were disposed of, directing the Appellate Authority to proceed independently and lawfully. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314331