https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315 The Punjab and Haryana HC allowed a petition challenging rejection of emergency parole for a prisoner serving ten years under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, who sought release to care for his ailing father under the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988. The court found the petitioner was not a hardcore criminal and the administrative decision lacked reasonableness under the Wednesbury principle, as authorities failed to demonstrate that release would endanger state security or public order, making only general assertions about multiple cases without specific evidence. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 17:04:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315 The Punjab and Haryana HC allowed a petition challenging rejection of emergency parole for a prisoner serving ten years under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, who sought release to care for his ailing father under the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988. The court found the petitioner was not a hardcore criminal and the administrative decision lacked reasonableness under the Wednesbury principle, as authorities failed to demonstrate that release would endanger state security or public order, making only general assertions about multiple cases without specific evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315