<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1981 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315</link>
    <description>Parole under the Haryana parole framework must be decided on relevant statutory grounds, including the specific restrictions for hardcore prisoners and the legally recognised public order or security concerns. A refusal based mainly on inapplicable considerations, such as an unsupported assumption about the prisoner&#039;s status or an unverified period requirement, is vulnerable to judicial review. Where the record discloses no material showing threat to State security or public order, administrative rejection may be treated as arbitrary and unreasonable. The writ court therefore treated the parole refusal as unsustainable and set it aside, emphasising that parole decisions must rest on statutory conditions and relevant considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 17:04:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1981 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315</link>
      <description>Parole under the Haryana parole framework must be decided on relevant statutory grounds, including the specific restrictions for hardcore prisoners and the legally recognised public order or security concerns. A refusal based mainly on inapplicable considerations, such as an unsupported assumption about the prisoner&#039;s status or an unverified period requirement, is vulnerable to judicial review. Where the record discloses no material showing threat to State security or public order, administrative rejection may be treated as arbitrary and unreasonable. The writ court therefore treated the parole refusal as unsustainable and set it aside, emphasising that parole decisions must rest on statutory conditions and relevant considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>