https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316 The Bombay HC partially set aside a NIA Court's bail order while upholding the ultimate grant of bail on different grounds. The HC found that the NIA Court erred in granting bail based on examination of prosecution witnesses, as this would allow endless successive bail applications and undermine trial proceedings. The Court held that merely because some witnesses were examined or turned hostile could not justify revisiting earlier bail rejections on merits. However, the HC sustained the bail grant on grounds of prolonged incarceration exceeding six years and delayed trial proceedings, while imposing additional stringent conditions on the accused. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 17:04:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316 The Bombay HC partially set aside a NIA Court's bail order while upholding the ultimate grant of bail on different grounds. The HC found that the NIA Court erred in granting bail based on examination of prosecution witnesses, as this would allow endless successive bail applications and undermine trial proceedings. The Court held that merely because some witnesses were examined or turned hostile could not justify revisiting earlier bail rejections on merits. However, the HC sustained the bail grant on grounds of prolonged incarceration exceeding six years and delayed trial proceedings, while imposing additional stringent conditions on the accused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316