https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316 Successive bail applications cannot be allowed merely because some prosecution witnesses have since been examined or turned hostile; earlier rejection orders on merits must be addressed, and fresh grounds are required before departing from them. The note also states that, even under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, prolonged custody and inordinate trial delay can justify bail where the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 is being defeated and the trial is unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time. On the stated facts, prolonged incarceration outweighed the statutory bail restriction, and stringent conditions were treated as sufficient to protect the trial. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316 Successive bail applications cannot be allowed merely because some prosecution witnesses have since been examined or turned hostile; earlier rejection orders on merits must be addressed, and fresh grounds are required before departing from them. The note also states that, even under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, prolonged custody and inordinate trial delay can justify bail where the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 is being defeated and the trial is unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time. On the stated facts, prolonged incarceration outweighed the statutory bail restriction, and stringent conditions were treated as sufficient to protect the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314316