<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1445 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753392</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging trial court orders regarding partition of ancestral property between siblings. The plaintiff sister sought to restrain defendant brother from obstructing cultivation of her partitioned share, which she had been enjoying for over three decades. The trial court granted temporary restraint preventing obstruction of cultivation and creation of third party interests. The HC held that under Article 227, it will not interfere with lower court orders unless there is manifest miscarriage of justice or patent error apparent on record. Finding the trial court properly addressed the controversy and protected both parties&#039; rights, with valid confirmation by appellate court, the HC dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1445 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753392</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging trial court orders regarding partition of ancestral property between siblings. The plaintiff sister sought to restrain defendant brother from obstructing cultivation of her partitioned share, which she had been enjoying for over three decades. The trial court granted temporary restraint preventing obstruction of cultivation and creation of third party interests. The HC held that under Article 227, it will not interfere with lower court orders unless there is manifest miscarriage of justice or patent error apparent on record. Finding the trial court properly addressed the controversy and protected both parties&#039; rights, with valid confirmation by appellate court, the HC dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>