https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312 The SC dismissed the petition under Art. 32, finding it devoid of merit, as the petitioner failed to establish title to the disputed property. The Court underscored the necessity of resolving title disputes before claiming infringement of property rights. The petitioner's claims regarding the property's classification and usage were deemed factual disputes under the ongoing enquiry by the Collector. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with costs, affirming the jurisdiction of authorities under the Bihar Land Reforms Act and the need for constitutional challenges to be substantiated by clear title. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312 The SC dismissed the petition under Art. 32, finding it devoid of merit, as the petitioner failed to establish title to the disputed property. The Court underscored the necessity of resolving title disputes before claiming infringement of property rights. The petitioner's claims regarding the property's classification and usage were deemed factual disputes under the ongoing enquiry by the Collector. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with costs, affirming the jurisdiction of authorities under the Bihar Land Reforms Act and the need for constitutional challenges to be substantiated by clear title. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312