https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312 An Article 32 petition seeking to restrain inquiry under the Bihar Land Reforms Act was held untenable because the claim depended on disputed questions of title and fact, including whether the land was raiyati land and whether the buildings were used as a kutcheri. As title had not been established and those factual issues were within the statutory authorities' jurisdiction, no enforceable constitutional grievance arose at that stage. The Court therefore found no infringement of fundamental rights and held that constitutional relief could not be invoked while the property controversy remained subject to lawful adjudication in the pending proceedings. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312 An Article 32 petition seeking to restrain inquiry under the Bihar Land Reforms Act was held untenable because the claim depended on disputed questions of title and fact, including whether the land was raiyati land and whether the buildings were used as a kutcheri. As title had not been established and those factual issues were within the statutory authorities' jurisdiction, no enforceable constitutional grievance arose at that stage. The Court therefore found no infringement of fundamental rights and held that constitutional relief could not be invoked while the property controversy remained subject to lawful adjudication in the pending proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314312