https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314310 The Ct concluded that the suit was not barred by the Law of Limitation, as the final order confirming the sale was issued on August 21, 1886, making the suit timely. Additionally, the sale was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with the Bengal Act VII of 1880. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondents' costs. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 1896 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 31 May 2024 12:39:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314310 The Ct concluded that the suit was not barred by the Law of Limitation, as the final order confirming the sale was issued on August 21, 1886, making the suit timely. Additionally, the sale was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with the Bengal Act VII of 1880. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondents' costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Feb 1896 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314310