https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753389 Gujarat HC dismissed application challenging impleadment of director under Section 319 CrPC in cheque dishonour case. Court held that director being signatory and in charge of business was deemed aware of statutory notice served on company and co-directors, making separate notice unnecessary. HC ruled that impleadment application filed before cognizance under Section 142 NI Act was not barred by limitation, as statutory period applies only after cognizance is taken. Trial court's order allowing impleadment was upheld as sustainable. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2024 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753389 Gujarat HC dismissed application challenging impleadment of director under Section 319 CrPC in cheque dishonour case. Court held that director being signatory and in charge of business was deemed aware of statutory notice served on company and co-directors, making separate notice unnecessary. HC ruled that impleadment application filed before cognizance under Section 142 NI Act was not barred by limitation, as statutory period applies only after cognizance is taken. Trial court's order allowing impleadment was upheld as sustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753389