https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753387 The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. The court held that since the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of the GST Act, an alternative statutory remedy was available. Following SC precedent in United Bank of India case, the HC ruled that writ courts should ordinarily not entertain petitions under Article 226 when effective alternative remedies exist. The petitioner's claims regarding improper service of notice and natural justice violations could be determined by the appellate authority through the statutory appeal process. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 May 2025 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753387 The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. The court held that since the impugned order was appealable under Section 107 of the GST Act, an alternative statutory remedy was available. Following SC precedent in United Bank of India case, the HC ruled that writ courts should ordinarily not entertain petitions under Article 226 when effective alternative remedies exist. The petitioner's claims regarding improper service of notice and natural justice violations could be determined by the appellate authority through the statutory appeal process. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753387