<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1433 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that exempted the respondent from service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994, and Notification No. 25/2012. The Tribunal concurred that the railway sidings constructed by the respondent fell outside the taxable scope, affirming the applicability of the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1433 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that exempted the respondent from service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994, and Notification No. 25/2012. The Tribunal concurred that the railway sidings constructed by the respondent fell outside the taxable scope, affirming the applicability of the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>