<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1430 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753377</link>
    <description>The AP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging Rural Development Cess (RDC) demand for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought waiver of RDC under various Government Orders and requested installment payment for APGST amount of Rs. 66,269/-. The court held it cannot order tax payment in installments, directing petitioner to approach concerned authority. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514/-, though petitioner was entitled to exemption under Government Orders, the court found petitioner had already collected the cess amount from FCI. Granting exemption would result in undue enrichment, therefore the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 08:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1430 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753377</link>
      <description>The AP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging Rural Development Cess (RDC) demand for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought waiver of RDC under various Government Orders and requested installment payment for APGST amount of Rs. 66,269/-. The court held it cannot order tax payment in installments, directing petitioner to approach concerned authority. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514/-, though petitioner was entitled to exemption under Government Orders, the court found petitioner had already collected the cess amount from FCI. Granting exemption would result in undue enrichment, therefore the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>