<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1418 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753365</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a 498-day delay in filing. The bench, consisting of CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, deemed the explanation for the delay inadequate, leading to the rejection of the petitions on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 08:38:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1418 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753365</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a 498-day delay in filing. The bench, consisting of CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, deemed the explanation for the delay inadequate, leading to the rejection of the petitions on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>