<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1993 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314296</link>
    <description>The Ct granted bail to the applicant under Sections 3 &amp; 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, emphasizing parity with co-accused who had previously received bail. Despite the respondent&#039;s opposition, the Ct noted the co-accused faced more serious allegations. Bail conditions included a PR bond, sureties, passport surrender, and compliance with court appearances, with potential legal consequences for violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1993 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314296</link>
      <description>The Ct granted bail to the applicant under Sections 3 &amp; 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, emphasizing parity with co-accused who had previously received bail. Despite the respondent&#039;s opposition, the Ct noted the co-accused faced more serious allegations. Bail conditions included a PR bond, sureties, passport surrender, and compliance with court appearances, with potential legal consequences for violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>