<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1408 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314300</link>
    <description>In cross-border child custody disputes, comity of courts and the child&#039;s welfare require due weight to be given to a foreign court&#039;s interim order where that court had the closest and most intimate connection with the children and acted first. A domestic court may depart from that approach only for special and compelling reasons, after considering whether a summary or elaborate inquiry is needed and whether repatriation would cause harm to the child. On the stated facts, the foreign court&#039;s interim directions were treated as controlling and the children were directed to be taken to the U.K. for proceedings there, with protective directions to safeguard participation and welfare.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1408 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314300</link>
      <description>In cross-border child custody disputes, comity of courts and the child&#039;s welfare require due weight to be given to a foreign court&#039;s interim order where that court had the closest and most intimate connection with the children and acted first. A domestic court may depart from that approach only for special and compelling reasons, after considering whether a summary or elaborate inquiry is needed and whether repatriation would cause harm to the child. On the stated facts, the foreign court&#039;s interim directions were treated as controlling and the children were directed to be taken to the U.K. for proceedings there, with protective directions to safeguard participation and welfare.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>