<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1438 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314303</link>
    <description>An order granting bail may be set aside in appeal where the court ignores material circumstances, misappreciates the accused&#039;s specific role, and exercises discretion without proper judicial application of mind. The Supreme Court noted that bail assessment must consider the nature and gravity of the offence, the evidence, and the risk of tampering, witness influence, or absconding. On the facts, the High Court overlooked allegations linking the accused to a premeditated murder, including contact with a hired sharpshooter and custody of weapons, and wrongly proceeded on the basis that no overt act was attributed. The bail order was held unsustainable and the application stood rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1438 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314303</link>
      <description>An order granting bail may be set aside in appeal where the court ignores material circumstances, misappreciates the accused&#039;s specific role, and exercises discretion without proper judicial application of mind. The Supreme Court noted that bail assessment must consider the nature and gravity of the offence, the evidence, and the risk of tampering, witness influence, or absconding. On the facts, the High Court overlooked allegations linking the accused to a premeditated murder, including contact with a hired sharpshooter and custody of weapons, and wrongly proceeded on the basis that no overt act was attributed. The bail order was held unsustainable and the application stood rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>