<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Best Judgment assessment u/s 144 without notice u/s 143(2) is invalid. Addition u/s 69A as unexplained money deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77977</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that a best judgment assessment u/s 144 without issuing notice u/s 143(2) is invalid if the assessee has filed a return and responded to AO&#039;s notice. Courts emphasize Section 144 is for non-compliance cases. Assessee provided details of cash deposits, supported by affidavits from relatives. Deposits were found to be from maturity proceeds, not unexplained money u/s 69A. Addition in brother&#039;s hands linked to joint account. CIT(A) erred in upholding half of assessment u/s 69A. Affidavits, if credible, can explain cash source. Lack of concrete reasons to reject explanations. Entire u/s 69A addition deleted, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC(1) &amp; 271F dropped. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 15:49:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 15:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Best Judgment assessment u/s 144 without notice u/s 143(2) is invalid. Addition u/s 69A as unexplained money deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77977</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that a best judgment assessment u/s 144 without issuing notice u/s 143(2) is invalid if the assessee has filed a return and responded to AO&#039;s notice. Courts emphasize Section 144 is for non-compliance cases. Assessee provided details of cash deposits, supported by affidavits from relatives. Deposits were found to be from maturity proceeds, not unexplained money u/s 69A. Addition in brother&#039;s hands linked to joint account. CIT(A) erred in upholding half of assessment u/s 69A. Affidavits, if credible, can explain cash source. Lack of concrete reasons to reject explanations. Entire u/s 69A addition deleted, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC(1) &amp; 271F dropped. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 15:49:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>