<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36934</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the expenditure on maintaining a guest house at the factory premises was not deductible as it did not meet the criteria of being exclusively for strangers, as required by the Income Tax Act. The Court disallowed the claim due to non-compliance with the prescribed rules, ruling in favor of the revenue. Additionally, the Court determined that the assessee was not entitled to a development rebate for new machinery as the reserve from earlier years did not fulfill the statutory requirement of creating a reserve from the profits of the relevant previous year. The Court ruled against the assessee, awarding costs to the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36934</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the expenditure on maintaining a guest house at the factory premises was not deductible as it did not meet the criteria of being exclusively for strangers, as required by the Income Tax Act. The Court disallowed the claim due to non-compliance with the prescribed rules, ruling in favor of the revenue. Additionally, the Court determined that the assessee was not entitled to a development rebate for new machinery as the reserve from earlier years did not fulfill the statutory requirement of creating a reserve from the profits of the relevant previous year. The Court ruled against the assessee, awarding costs to the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>