<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1395 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753342</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the appellant, incorporated under special legislation with complete state government control over appointments and policy decisions, qualifies as an instrumentality of state under Article 12 of the Constitution. Applying the Som Prakash Rekhi criteria, the tribunal found the appellant satisfied majority conditions for state status. Despite AO&#039;s view that appellant was a partnership firm liable to tax, ITAT determined the appellant was entitled to tax immunity under constitutional provisions. The tribunal noted appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in tax exemption status and allowed cancellation of wrongly issued PAN. Appeal allowed with complete tax exemption granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 10:45:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1395 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753342</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the appellant, incorporated under special legislation with complete state government control over appointments and policy decisions, qualifies as an instrumentality of state under Article 12 of the Constitution. Applying the Som Prakash Rekhi criteria, the tribunal found the appellant satisfied majority conditions for state status. Despite AO&#039;s view that appellant was a partnership firm liable to tax, ITAT determined the appellant was entitled to tax immunity under constitutional provisions. The tribunal noted appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in tax exemption status and allowed cancellation of wrongly issued PAN. Appeal allowed with complete tax exemption granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>