https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753333 HC set aside a GST demand order u/s 73 due to improper consideration of taxpayer's reply. The court found the Proper Officer failed to adequately review submitted documents and did not provide specific opportunities to address deficiencies. The case was remitted for re-adjudication, with the petitioner granted 30 days to file a supplementary reply and the Officer directed to issue a fresh speaking order after personal hearing. en-us Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753333 HC set aside a GST demand order u/s 73 due to improper consideration of taxpayer's reply. The court found the Proper Officer failed to adequately review submitted documents and did not provide specific opportunities to address deficiencies. The case was remitted for re-adjudication, with the petitioner granted 30 days to file a supplementary reply and the Officer directed to issue a fresh speaking order after personal hearing. Case-Laws GST Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753333