https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753275 Review jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or similar sufficient reason. It cannot be used to reargue the case or correct an allegedly wrong decision on merits, as that would amount to an appeal in disguise. Mere non-citation of Supreme Court precedent, without showing due diligence or a patent error, does not justify review. The review application was therefore not maintainable on the grounds urged and was rejected. en-us Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2024 22:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753275 Review jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or similar sufficient reason. It cannot be used to reargue the case or correct an allegedly wrong decision on merits, as that would amount to an appeal in disguise. Mere non-citation of Supreme Court precedent, without showing due diligence or a patent error, does not justify review. The review application was therefore not maintainable on the grounds urged and was rejected. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753275