https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314273 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether a part of the cause of action arises within the High Court's limits. Where the alleged misconduct, court martial, disciplinary action and appellate decision all occurred outside those limits, mere communication of the appellate order within the jurisdiction does not create jurisdiction. Earlier entertainment of the writ petition and party consent could not confer jurisdiction where none existed. The High Court therefore had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition challenging the disciplinary and appellate orders. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2024 17:30:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314273 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether a part of the cause of action arises within the High Court's limits. Where the alleged misconduct, court martial, disciplinary action and appellate decision all occurred outside those limits, mere communication of the appellate order within the jurisdiction does not create jurisdiction. Earlier entertainment of the writ petition and party consent could not confer jurisdiction where none existed. The High Court therefore had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition challenging the disciplinary and appellate orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314273