https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77932 The High Court dismissed a review petition regarding a fraudulent Input Tax Credit (I.T.C.) claim for inward supplies. The petitioner had obtained I.T.C. based on invoices from non-existent firms. Special Investigation Branch found the firms to be bogus with no actual supply of goods. Appellate authority's decision was upheld as it considered the evidence on record. The review petition was rejected as new evidence presented could have been submitted earlier and did not refute the findings. The court found no reason to review the earlier order and dismissed the petition. The case involved Order XLVII, Rule 1 (1) of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.). en-us Wed, 29 May 2024 15:30:05 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2024 15:30:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77932 The High Court dismissed a review petition regarding a fraudulent Input Tax Credit (I.T.C.) claim for inward supplies. The petitioner had obtained I.T.C. based on invoices from non-existent firms. Special Investigation Branch found the firms to be bogus with no actual supply of goods. Appellate authority's decision was upheld as it considered the evidence on record. The review petition was rejected as new evidence presented could have been submitted earlier and did not refute the findings. The court found no reason to review the earlier order and dismissed the petition. The case involved Order XLVII, Rule 1 (1) of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.). Highlights GST Wed, 29 May 2024 15:30:05 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77932