https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314271 A foreign matrimonial decree is not conclusive in India unless the foreign court had jurisdiction recognised by the law governing the marriage and the relief was granted on a ground available under that law, or the respondent voluntarily and effectively submitted to that forum; on those principles, the decree was held unenforceable in India. A photostat copy of the foreign judgment was not inadmissible merely because it was a photostat, but it still had to satisfy the statutory certification requirements for proof of a foreign public document, which it did not. The decree therefore could not be recognised, and the document tendered in proof was insufficient. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2024 12:52:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314271 A foreign matrimonial decree is not conclusive in India unless the foreign court had jurisdiction recognised by the law governing the marriage and the relief was granted on a ground available under that law, or the respondent voluntarily and effectively submitted to that forum; on those principles, the decree was held unenforceable in India. A photostat copy of the foreign judgment was not inadmissible merely because it was a photostat, but it still had to satisfy the statutory certification requirements for proof of a foreign public document, which it did not. The decree therefore could not be recognised, and the document tendered in proof was insufficient. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314271