<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36918</link>
    <description>Litigation expenses, consultation fees and travelling costs incurred to defend company resolutions recasting the articles of association and appointing managing agents qualify as revenue expenditure where they protect the ordinary conduct and continuity of business. Defending the validity of the articles was necessary to prevent disruption of business affairs and was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The expenditure does not become capital merely because it concerns corporate governance; it remains deductible where the litigation neither alters the capital structure nor acquires or enhances a capital asset. Accordingly, deduction is available under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:03:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36918</link>
      <description>Litigation expenses, consultation fees and travelling costs incurred to defend company resolutions recasting the articles of association and appointing managing agents qualify as revenue expenditure where they protect the ordinary conduct and continuity of business. Defending the validity of the articles was necessary to prevent disruption of business affairs and was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The expenditure does not become capital merely because it concerns corporate governance; it remains deductible where the litigation neither alters the capital structure nor acquires or enhances a capital asset. Accordingly, deduction is available under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>