<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314269</link>
    <description>Where comprehensive guidelines for under-trial prisoners were already in place, the SC declined to issue further general directions and held that repeated broad orders were unnecessary. It emphasised that relief should be considered on the facts of each case, while monitoring compliance with the existing guidelines could be more effectively undertaken by the High Courts, which are better placed to collect status reports and review implementation. The Court also reiterated the need for expeditious criminal trials, but left broader supervision of subordinate courts to the concerned High Courts. No fresh substantive directions were issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 11:11:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314269</link>
      <description>Where comprehensive guidelines for under-trial prisoners were already in place, the SC declined to issue further general directions and held that repeated broad orders were unnecessary. It emphasised that relief should be considered on the facts of each case, while monitoring compliance with the existing guidelines could be more effectively undertaken by the High Courts, which are better placed to collect status reports and review implementation. The Court also reiterated the need for expeditious criminal trials, but left broader supervision of subordinate courts to the concerned High Courts. No fresh substantive directions were issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>