<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 764 - CEGAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the duty demand for yarn based on sample testing results, aligning with the Hon&#039;ble Madras HC&#039;s judgment in Cambodia Mills Ltd. case. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed, upholding the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s order, which relied on established jurisprudence that supports periodic sample testing as governing production until the next sample draw.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 10:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 764 - CEGAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the duty demand for yarn based on sample testing results, aligning with the Hon&#039;ble Madras HC&#039;s judgment in Cambodia Mills Ltd. case. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed, upholding the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s order, which relied on established jurisprudence that supports periodic sample testing as governing production until the next sample draw.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>