<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314267</link>
    <description>Exclusion of loading and unloading of bricks from a labour-abolition notification was held discriminatory because the same loading work in other departments had been covered without a rational basis. The Court treated purchase, transport, unloading, stacking and use of bricks as one continuous industrial process, and held that the brick-handling work was incidental and allied to the notified work. The record did not support the claim that the activity lacked perennial character. The impugned exclusion was therefore unconstitutional, and the affected workmen were entitled to the same treatment as notified workers in the Brick Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 10:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314267</link>
      <description>Exclusion of loading and unloading of bricks from a labour-abolition notification was held discriminatory because the same loading work in other departments had been covered without a rational basis. The Court treated purchase, transport, unloading, stacking and use of bricks as one continuous industrial process, and held that the brick-handling work was incidental and allied to the notified work. The record did not support the claim that the activity lacked perennial character. The impugned exclusion was therefore unconstitutional, and the affected workmen were entitled to the same treatment as notified workers in the Brick Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>