<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753259</link>
    <description>HC quashed an order under CGST Act concerning a tax demand of Rs 6.27 crore. The court found the original order cryptic and lacking proper consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s reply. HC set aside the order, directing the tax authority to re-adjudicate the show cause notice, providing the taxpayer 30 days to submit a detailed response and mandating a fresh speaking order within prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753259</link>
      <description>HC quashed an order under CGST Act concerning a tax demand of Rs 6.27 crore. The court found the original order cryptic and lacking proper consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s reply. HC set aside the order, directing the tax authority to re-adjudicate the show cause notice, providing the taxpayer 30 days to submit a detailed response and mandating a fresh speaking order within prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>