<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1310 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753257</link>
    <description>HC rejected review application challenging an order related to GST proceedings. The court found the review was misconceived since the Supreme Court had already disposed of the main writ petition. The consequential order was in alignment with the SC&#039;s previous directive, and no further relief could be granted through this review application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1310 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753257</link>
      <description>HC rejected review application challenging an order related to GST proceedings. The court found the review was misconceived since the Supreme Court had already disposed of the main writ petition. The consequential order was in alignment with the SC&#039;s previous directive, and no further relief could be granted through this review application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>