https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753255 The HC set aside the impugned order under the CGST Act, 2017, due to inadequate consideration of the petitioner's detailed replies. The case was remitted for re-adjudication, allowing the petitioner 30 days to file a further reply. The Proper Officer must issue a fresh speaking order within the statutory timeframe. The challenge to Notification No. 56 of 2023 remains open, with the Court emphasizing fair re-adjudication and proper consideration of submissions. The petition was disposed of, preserving all rights and contentions of the parties involved. en-us Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2024 14:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753255 The HC set aside the impugned order under the CGST Act, 2017, due to inadequate consideration of the petitioner's detailed replies. The case was remitted for re-adjudication, allowing the petitioner 30 days to file a further reply. The Proper Officer must issue a fresh speaking order within the statutory timeframe. The challenge to Notification No. 56 of 2023 remains open, with the Court emphasizing fair re-adjudication and proper consideration of submissions. The petition was disposed of, preserving all rights and contentions of the parties involved. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753255