<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1305 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753252</link>
    <description>HC ruled on detention of goods under Section 129(1) of U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017. Court directed release of detained goods and vehicle upon tax and penalty deposit by petitioner. While mandating compliance, HC explicitly preserved petitioner&#039;s right to appeal against future penalty orders, ensuring procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1305 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753252</link>
      <description>HC ruled on detention of goods under Section 129(1) of U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017. Court directed release of detained goods and vehicle upon tax and penalty deposit by petitioner. While mandating compliance, HC explicitly preserved petitioner&#039;s right to appeal against future penalty orders, ensuring procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>