<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1279 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753226</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the approval of a resolution plan. The appellant argued their email dated 05.06.2023 was not considered while another party&#039;s documents were accepted, and challenged the issuance of a second EOI. The NCLAT held that records showed the decision excluded the appellant&#039;s submission, finding no substance in the claim. Regarding the second EOI challenge, the court noted the appellant participated in the fresh process after the CoC invited new EOI due to plan values being below liquidation value, and the appellant failed to challenge the second EOI issuance when it occurred. The appeal was dismissed with no errors found in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1279 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753226</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the approval of a resolution plan. The appellant argued their email dated 05.06.2023 was not considered while another party&#039;s documents were accepted, and challenged the issuance of a second EOI. The NCLAT held that records showed the decision excluded the appellant&#039;s submission, finding no substance in the claim. Regarding the second EOI challenge, the court noted the appellant participated in the fresh process after the CoC invited new EOI due to plan values being below liquidation value, and the appellant failed to challenge the second EOI issuance when it occurred. The appeal was dismissed with no errors found in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>